this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
132 points (90.2% liked)

Technology

59421 readers
2852 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
132
Who’s Behind All the ‘Pussy in Bio’ on X? (nymag.com)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Spam is hard. No real platform has solved it completely, and none ever will. Spammers evolve, platforms catch up, spammers evolve again, and so on until the last post is posted and the last user signs out. Individual spam tactics, however, do tend to have short lives, and while PIB won’t be with us forever, it’s notable that it has been with us for so long — a consequence, perhaps, of the near-total elimination of the teams that used to deal with such things at Twitter. Long enough to become a platformwide joke. Long enough to become genuinely sort of annoying even to the users who think it’s funny. And long enough to get some idea of who is posting all that P in all those B’s, and why.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That was really interesting to read. A lot of people have been saying that Twitter had got a lot worse since ManBaby came along. Not being a user anymore I have nothing to dispute that with.

What is interesting is the companies who are arguably making it 'worse' (partly) are backing that statement up by saying it's better than it was for them. Easier to do business. Easier to make money. Easier to make it worse.

I suppose that's what happens when the owner sees moderation of this type of content as 'censorship'.

Twitter users confuse me. Maybe they double-down on the moderation of their own bubble so it's not quite as bad for them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

People are willing to deal with a lot of thing before it gets to a breaking point - whether it's a social media platform or anything else in life. Change is scary and many users keep their accounts to follow specific artists/series/topics who may or may not have easily findable alternatives to switch to.

Add the fact that majority of casual users doesn't know about other similar platforms or (in case of fediverse) finds them confusing and suddenly they have more incentive to just put up with the problems as long as they can. More so since such change requires rebuilding of communities and relationships.

Finally, there's laziness - most people just can't be bothered to change things in their life unless they have no other choice/choice was made for them (ex. service they used died).

Why do you think so many refused to leave reddit after the whole boycott drama? It sucks but that's how humans are. There's only so much we can care about and social media aren't exactly high on the totem pole.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Well said.