Technology

34894 readers

871 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Today's AI is unreasonable (www.anildash.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There's an extraordinary amount of hype around "AI" right now, perhaps even greater than in past cycles, where we've seen an AI bubble about once per decade. This time, the focus is on generative systems, particularly LLMs and other tools designed to generate plausible outputs that either make people feel like the response is correct, or where the response is sufficient to fill in for domains where correctness doesn't matter.

But we can tell the traditional tech industry (the handful of giant tech companies, along with startups backed by the handful of most powerful venture capital firms) is in the midst of building another "Web3"-style froth bubble because they've again abandoned one of the core values of actual technology-based advancement: reason.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (18 children)

Today's AI is way worst then when ChatGPT was first released.... it is way too censored.

But either way, I never considered LLMs to be A.I. even if they have the possibility to be great.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

*too

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

sorry for all my spelling mistakes... I fixed a few. I think everyone should spee(a)k binary anyways.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I’m sorry I’m a spelling spaz.

load more comments (15 replies)