this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
193 points (88.8% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2556 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (17 children)

Also, as we realize that we don't need 400+ miles of range in a commuter car, cheaper battery chemistries make a lot of sense, despite their shorter range per kg or lb

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (7 children)

If I buy an EV I would like it to do 400 miles, but I don't need 0-60 in 3 seconds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I think trim packages or settings in the car that trade acceleration for range make a lot of sense.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Ye canna change the laws of physics! Acceleration is proportional to force exerted (F=ma) and has nothing to do with the amount of energy stored, which gives you range. You might get a few percent efficiency bonus from lesser acceleration due to losses (so 2-3 extra Km per 100), but you can't "trade acceleration for range"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)