this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
853 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3463 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
853
The HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementation (www.gamingonlinux.com)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
153 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 276 points 8 months ago (61 children)

Sounds like hdmi Forum are a bunch of twats. Time for a new format.

[–] [email protected] 314 points 8 months ago (51 children)

DisplayPort already exists

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (30 children)

And also USB c

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I love having mysterious cables that may or may not do things I expect them to when plugged into ports that may or may not support the features I think they do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

If the implementation is so broad that I have to break out my label maker, can we even really call it a "standard"

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)
load more comments (57 replies)