this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
374 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59148 readers
2310 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (13 children)

I'll second Proton. It sucks to have to pay for services again to have something that matches the generous free shit that we got before... but seems those wild west days of the internet, unless you were grandfathered on or have to give up a lot of info in return... are now long gone.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

If you're not paying for a service, then you're the product. I never understood the expectation that people should just provide you email and storage for free, because?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This saying is actually horseshit, though. The profit motive and infinite growth model of capitalism guarantees that even if you are paying for a product, your data and attention — everything that can be — will be monetized eventually.

The saying should be "if the service isn't open-source and E2E encrypted, you're the product"

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

Nah I'd disagree. Infinite growth motive doesn't necessarily apply to private companies. To suggest there's unbridled greed present in every company is just a falsehood.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)