this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
439 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59421 readers
5022 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Doctrow argues that nascent tech unionization (which we're closer to having now than ever before) combined with bipartisan fear (and consequent regulation) either directly or via agencies like the FTC and FCC can help to curb Big Tech's power, and the enshittification that it has wrought.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 142 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (9 children)

where did it all go wrong?

Capitalism is where.

It’ll always fight to go there, because least offered most gained is the name of the business.

Sure you can split them up and regulate them, that’ll last for a few years or decades but money is power and they will wield that power to undo it all again, time after time to seek profit.

The only solution is a system that doesn’t value capital.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Continued vigilance is the price of lasting deenshittification

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Or just not operating under a capitalist model.

Which has many other benefits as well. Who wants perpetual class war.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

No human-led system can fully protect against complacency.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)