this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
1963 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

32464 readers
598 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

yo but tbh this gets old.

i just want my stuff to update without me having to find out a year later its unmantained and had a fork all along.

or having to watch the repositories of stuff i use for signs it might be unmantained. i didnt know half the (popular!) stuff mentioned here was abandoned then forked.

libforknotifier when (or even how)?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, it would be nice if it was easier for devs to just turn over the project to an "official" fork. Unfortunately, I'm sure that would get abused by scammers taking over projects forcefully and adding in malware before anyone notices.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're spot on with the latter, I've come across a few projects over the years where the ownership is transferred and it's then loaded up with malware or even just instantly abandoned again because the new owner just wants it on their GitHub to get a job or something.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I've come across a few projects over the years where the ownership is transferred and it's then loaded up with malware

See: The Great Suspender

The original developer sold the repo to a new, anonymous maintainer. The new maintainer abandoned the repo but continued updating the Chrome Web Store version of the addon. That version eventually got delisted by Google for including malware.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)