this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
48 points (87.5% liked)

Privacy

31859 readers
202 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As the title suggests. I want community opinions on the Arc browser.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago (8 children)

A Firefox fork is fine. LibreWolf in particular picks up the pieces Mozilla keeps throwing everywhere, and then makes the browser much more private.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

LibreWolf does seem to go a bit too far with the hardening. It's fine if you're used to Tor Browser or Mull Browser but as a general recommendation... ehh.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Librewolf gives you options, and if you don't want to toggle them on, you're free to do so. I vehemently disagree with your analysis and I believe the protection that Librewolf provides should be considered bare-minimum in this age. This should be the default browser, not Firefox

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Librewolf gives you options, and if you don't want to toggle them on, you're free to do so.

These do sound like they are enabled by default though, hence the breakage?

I believe the protection that Librewolf provides should be considered bare-minimum in this age.

If websites work with them, sure. But if they don't, try explaining that to your grandma.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

They aren't though

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)