this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
47 points (66.7% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I fucked with the title a bit. What i linked to was actually a mastodon post linking to an actual thing. but in my defense, i found it because cory doctorow boosted it, so, in a way, i am providing the original source here.

please argue. please do not remove.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (27 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (26 children)

this reads like an appeal to ridicule. if you have an objection to what I said please state it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (13 children)

Every web request costs someone money. If you aren't paying them you are being provided a service. They've given you knowledge/ material in their possession free of charge. You are taking advantage of that good will by using the content for purposes not intended. That is a moral failing.

To be clear the ownership of the material is not important, just the access is immoral, as the harm is already done.

Ill add the caveat that it can be moral if they've specifically told you you can via the websites robot.txt file which websites of consequence all have. But the assumption has to be they don't intend this because that is how consent works.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

the assumption has to be they don't intend this

why? if someone publishes something on port 80, why should I ever assume they mean anything but for me to have and use that data?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because there is a standard way for people to make their consent known. Just because you ignore someone withholding you consent doesn't mean you are free morally.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I'd say it is immoral not to share useful information with other people.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)