108
Excuse me, but the industries AI is disrupting are not lucrative
(www.theintrinsicperspective.com)
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
108 points (84.6% liked)
Technology
59374 readers
3125 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Weird that AI isnt replacing things like management, CEOs, stock investors, accountants... you know, jobs that tend to be about numbers and efficiency, which you would think AI would excel at.
Instead, we have it skirting copyright by stealing other people works and changing it just enough to not be a direct copy.
Computers already replaced a lot of them long ago.
What part of their jobs do you think an AI can replace?
The whole sitting around, profiting from actual laborers part, I'm guessing.
YouTube sacks people by algorithm for some time now.
The fucking antiwork crowd is insufferable and intellectually dishonest. Be better. This is such a sad comment.
Why? Why can an AI not replace a CEO? And why has CEO compensation risen, while average worker compensation dropped, all while worker output has increased over the past decades? That seems like simple math, that the money isn't going to who it should be going to and is just going to management and investors because they make the rules
The issue you're speaking about is an issue of oligopoles and giant businesses, not ceos and management. It's a breakdown of economic principles, namely, supply and demand of labor, due to oligopoles.
And giant businesses and oligopolies are led by.... who exactly? Sure, you can say "not all CEOs" but still, too many CEOs.
I do appreciate the added nuance and more accuracy tho.
There are thousands of unproblmatic ceos to every problematic ceo.
You issue is with the top couple hundred businesses. There are literally 100s of thousands of ceos, managers, and leadership individuals who are not part of the problem. Look at the responses here. This group think mob would have you believe every single ceo is Satan.
Thousands for every one, eh? You got a citation for that wild claim, friendo? I mean, talk about bootlicking. FFS
Just go look up how many businesses there are in America. You can do some rough math based on that, shouldn't be too hard. It's amazing you call me a bootlicker over pretty tame comments that really shouldn't be controversial. You antiwork folk really hate every business owner no matter what, don't ya?
As a business owner myself, I now know you're even more full of shit than I knew before. Well done.
You're a useful idiot for the billionaire class. You'll never earn what they lucked (or were born) into regardless of how hard you try. Wake up, bootlicker.
Stop simping for the rich. They don't love you.
You really think all ceos and managers do zero work?
You do realize there are closed of companies that aren't Amazon and tesla, right?
There are literally tens of thousands of ceos of small companies and non profits that work their ass off.
This is why you are being intellectually dishonest. You're not that stupid, but you won't admit it.
You're right, your comment is pathetically sad
womp womp
I love the ~~smell~~ taste of boot in the morning.