this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
19 points (77.1% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
785 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've heard arguments for both sides and i think it's more complicated then simply yes or no. what do you guys think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Only if the AI is sentient and created the image of its own free will and creativity. Otherwise no.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If the AI created an image with its own free will, it still wouldn't be copyrightable. Only works created by a human can be copyrighted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

That wasn’t the question.

Whether works generated by non-human intelligence can be copyrighted is an unsettled question of law with conflicting rulings in different courts.