this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
141 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
2961 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Report: Apple to end partnership with bank that backs Apple Card, savings accounts::Goldman Sachs has lost billions of dollars on its consumer-focused businesses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Apple is probably not going to partner with anyone because they're becoming the bank

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That is a LOT harder done than said. Apple might have the resources, but they don't have the time or focus to become an actual bank.

They'll just go to some other bank, willing to take on the shittier client risk. Probably Citi or the GE/Synchrony bank. Capital One if they smile real nice and bring flowers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah they have a physical storefront in every state so, as a bank, they would need to follow the specific financial laws of each state. Gets super complicated because you end up with different interest rates depending on where the customer lives.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Even if they decided to do it themselves, they'd spin up a subsidiary to do the actual banking. No way Apple would want their retail stores having to live up the the rather strict standards of banks.

load more comments (1 replies)