this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
994 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

34912 readers
1380 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Solar now being the cheapest energy source made its rounds on Lemmy some weeks ago, if I remember correctly. I just found this graphic and felt it was worth sharing independently.

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/cheap-renewables-growth

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Making up straw men to defeat?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

if you cite chernobyl that's exactly what you're saying. it'll never happen again because no one's that dumb

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fukushima happened in “smart” Japan because it was cheaper to put the backup generators in the basement than to build a concrete podium taller than the tsunamis that previously hit the site.

Capitalism will always choose cost over safety. Even then nuclear ends up going way over budget.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then we shouldn't leave energy security and the climate in the hands of capital. Energy should be nationalised.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

indeed. also chernobyl and fukushima aren't comparable, really. I'd support a law that all new power reactors need to have passive cooling relying on the laws of physics, not relying on external power, but that's not a high bar and many designs already have it. remember that most currently operating reactors were built all at once in the mid 20th century and even then their safety record has been great. we can do better with new construction

load more comments (1 replies)