209
SanDisk Extreme Pro Failures Result From Design and Manufacturing Flaws, Says Data Recovery Firm
(www.tomshardware.com)
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
209 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
59421 readers
3645 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Get a cheap 2.5" SATA enclosure or an m.2 enclosure and throw a real SSD in it. That's what I've been doing and I get significantly higher speeds for significantly cheaper, as well as not having any fail on me
Dont use SSDs for offline backups. The flash storage can experience random bit flips if not powered on every now and then.
Do you have more info?
The minimum specs I've seen for NAND flash chips are 10 year retention time at room temperature.
Being powered on isn't enough to change this, the firmware would have to be actively reading, erasing and writing blocks of data to refresh them. I'm sure there are some that will do this, but it would increases some other data loss risks, wear rates and power draw; so I suspect (?) it's not universal.
My professor told me this fact in class, but upon searching for papers I did not find anything to support it.
So probably you are right.
Me having some datasheets that claim one thing doesn't mean it applies to everything and every implementation. Your prof might be right.