this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
970 points (98.4% liked)

xkcd

8814 readers
192 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://xkcd.com/2846

Alt text:

I average out the spring and fall changes and just set my clocks 39 minutes ahead year-round.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (17 children)

I never understand the anti timezone argument... Right now I know that across the world they'll be working somewhere between 8h and 17h local like anywhere else in the world, so I do some quick math and I know when that is in relation to me. Without time zones I need to be actively informed at what time someone across the world is working in order to know when I can contact them...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But you are making assumptions which are not really true anywhere. Working hours I Spain and Germany are already white different. Main reason is of course that they share the same time zone by law, but are not geographically in the same time zone. But there are some additional differences in culture which extend this effect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but it's still true that businesses operate during hours similar to any other places in the world. Even in Spain, ~9 to ~14 then ~17 to ~20, the day time hours are still in the "rest of the world bracket".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, but that still means you are not reaching someone by phone at work during 4 hours of you previously mentioned 8-17 Windows.

As someone currently working from Ireland with my usual office in Germany (laptop still configured this way) with a Team from India and DST ending next week, I would prefer to drop the calculations and just remember when each colleague approximately comes online. That is not the same for each colleague and day anyways.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)