this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
632 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
3606 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 210 points 1 year ago (39 children)

BuT bRaVE isN't ThaT bAd 🤡

[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (36 children)

Yep, this news actually broke a couple days ago, I remember seeing a Brave fanboy having a meltdown over it and ranting about how Mozilla is the real shady company, blah, blah, blah.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Oh dear lord. What did they say in support of their “Mozilla is shady” argument?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably something about Google.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah if it's the comment chain that I think they're referring to, I believe it came down to Mozilla "being in bed with Google" because Google is the default search engine.

I'll take the default search engine being Google over things like affiliate links being hijacked, but maybe I'm crazy for taking that position.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Typical Brave user hating google while using chrome with preinstalled extensions. Everything about that browser is the opposite of what it should be. Same with the users.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)