this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
149 points (89.0% liked)

Technology

59421 readers
3619 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Dozens join lawsuit alleging Apple AirTags are stalkers’ “weapon of choice.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

Why blame Apple for this?

Would you sue Ford for making a windowless van that makes it so easy to transport kidnapped children?

When you configure the AirTag, there is an alert which explicitly states that using these to stalk people is illegal. If someone does try to smuggle one into you and you have any smartphone, it will let you know you’re being stalked.

I know how much this community looooves to shit on Apple, but this case is completely asinine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I wonder if Apple could give an option for the anti stalking to android. If they could but they aren't, that could be an argument that they are making stalking easier to promote their ecosystem.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if Apple could give an option for the anti stalking to android.

Apple and Google collaborated on a specification for this and anti-stalking rolled out to Android in August.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Great! This lawsuit is even more silly then.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)