this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
279 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

34889 readers
601 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Not being encumbered by patents is a huge advantage for MP3s going forward, and the reality is that MP3 is good enough for vast majority of situations. The improvements newer formats like AAC bring are not worth the trouble of being chained to a proprietary format.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Sure, but is there any practical benefit using Opus given that MP3 is much more widely implemented?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Much better quality for the same bitrate and it's supported pretty much everywhere too.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was a flac snob when I was younger, and I can say with certainty: 320kbps mp3s or even VBR are indistinguishable from opus or even lossless except when listening very very very closely on high end hardware. I'm very into audio still and production etc. That's not to say opus isn't better or higher quality, but the difference it makes is decidedly negligible to the vast majority of listeners. I guarantee that almost everyone would fail to do better than a coin flip a/b testing these technologies on the same audio recording.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

192kbps opus will allow you to achieve roughly the same quality as 320kbps mp3. If you stream your music from any device or have a larger collection this difference can matter a lot.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

I guess my collection's just not big enough for this to have become an issue.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

As a music producer, you notice 192k MP3. The next jumps you probably don't notice. I'm still a flac snob because I have to work a lot with original quality files, but for the average users there's probably not even a difference between MP3 192k+ and flac or wav or opus or whatever.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)