this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
69 points (83.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40219 readers
1294 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am building my personal private cloud. I am considering using second hand dell optiplexes as worker nodes, but they only have 1 NIC and I'd need a contraption like this for my redundant network.

Then this wish came to my mind. Theoretically, such a one box solution could be faster than gigabit too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Personal Private Cloud then all the money spent on a truly redundant network back-bone is far better spent on just about anything else. Especially if your solution relies on notoriously unrealiable USB nics.

If redundant everything is important then you need to change your planning toward proper rack servers and switches, only way to get a cost effective reliable redundant setup. Use CEPH rather than RAID and ideally, if your workloads are runnable as containers, use a solution that allows you to abstract away the whole server concept as well. Hyper-converged infrastructure is excellent for cost effective setups.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If redundant everything is important then you need to change your planning toward proper rack servers and switches

I ain't got that budget man.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then skip redundant networking and use that cash on the router hardware such that you get enough ports that you won't need a switch

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is for a challenge, the goal is to build a cloud with workload decoupled from servers decoupled from users who'd deploy the workload, with redundant network and storage, no single choke point for network traffic, and I am trying to achieve this with a small budget.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah okay. If you don't have any PCI slots available then USB is going to be the only option then. Though if you have WiFi you could use that as your fail over solution.

Basically, from a hardware standpoint, I'd say a minimum viable solution would look like (no wifi):

  • 2 cheap 4-6 port Switches. Preferably with an uplink port and then you can mock redundant ISP connection by putting a splitter on the WAN connection and putting it into each of the two switches.

  • 3-4 worker nodes each connected to both switches. Preferably a PCI nic but if that is a non-starter then USB. Though here is where pretty much every cent should be spent. Important that each has a minimum of 200 GB storage because that enables you to abstract storage into a CEPH pool and still have enough space to run some decent example workloads.

All other redundancy can and should be handled in software. OpenStack is one approach, Proxmox can probably also work.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)