this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
80 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59421 readers
5527 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
80
US-China tech war: RISC-V chip technology emerges as new battleground (www.reuters.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So the US wants to ban US companies from working with the Chinese on Risc-V technology. I believe this is the reason why the RISC-V Foundation based itself in Switzerland, to avoid the US government from interfering with the spirit of open source. Your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ban open and royalty-free instruction set? WTF.

Next will be the Linux kernel?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

“I fear that our export-control laws are not equipped to deal with the challenge of open-source software - whether in advanced semiconductor designs like RISC-V or in the area of AI - and a dramatic paradigm shift is needed,” Warner said in a statement to Reuters.

huh, well that's not something I've had to think about before.

Edit:

I guess this a matter of what precedent is set, and limiting this kind of talk to a few distinct areas.

It would be AWFUL for so many sectors if we start placing blockers on open collaboration and access to information. A non-tech example might be health research where sometimes limits make sense (ex. Independent research on diseases, when something has the potential to be weaponized), but for the most part there's so much good that comes from open collaboration.

There's this feeling that's sometimes pushed where "conflict is inevitable", but it's... not? It's harder to work towards something together, and defaulting to conflict is the lazy way out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I thought Bernstein v. United States established that source code was protected speech?

load more comments (1 replies)