this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
91 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
7834 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What part of that is practical?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Practical as in being able to be done, rather than theoretical and not able to be done. (As the man said, just because it can be done doesn’t mean it should be done). Genuine question: did you intend another meaning of practical?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't buy for a second that catastrophe can actually be built.

It's 100% pure "CGI engineering". All the effort went into a snazzy presentation to sell it to petro-billionaires ego-blimps with no consideration for feasibility.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fair enough. I don’t think it’s useful to build it, (I think it’s a stupid way for wanker money hoarders to buy recognition and fame), but we know how to pour concrete, we know how to install air conditioning, we know how to construct large buildings and make them habitable. Let me fall back on “English is my second language”; I think we both agree on the (lack of) usefulness of the project. I happen to think that it could be built (practical); or at least started, but that doesn’t make it a useful thing to build (practical). I don’t feel that I can clearly explain what I thought the word “practical” meant; but I didn’t mean to get into an argument about it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Don't sweat it, we are in agreement except I'm certain the engineering won't hold up. It's not just building a wall, they need to build all the infrastructure inside of it (somehow).

Will they shove some sand around and start pouring cement and waste a bunch of money before moving to the next shiny CGI project? Very likely. So it doesn't really matter, they aren't ever even going to try to finish this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)