this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1140 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2840 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Mega corporations should not be allowed to use nuclear power plants purely for themselves.

Also, if you need that much power to do something bthat a human brain does with under 100 watts, I really think you're doing it wrong

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you're so smart why don't you come up with a way to do it under 100 watts???

Also this is training them not using them. Using an ai consumes significantly less power than the process to train it sort of like how humans take more to learn than to put something in practice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't think the point that's being made is "smarturr" but rather that stay within the margins of available power.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think his point is that the person he responded to is proposing well meaning feeling based policies without having any real knowledge of any of the negative impacts his policy would have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like I'm in that butterfly meme, going like is this what reasonable conversation is like.

<3

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)