this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
439 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

59123 readers
4466 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Authors using a new tool to search a list of 183,000 books used to train AI are furious to find their works on the list.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (68 children)

I certainly hope that none of these authors have ever read a book before or have been inspired by something written by another author.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (23 children)

That would be a much better comparison if it was artificial intelligence, but these are just reinforcement learning models. They do not get inspired.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (19 children)

just reinforcement learning models

...like the naturally occuring neural networks are.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The brain does not work the way you think… (I work in the field, bio-informatics). What you call “neural networks” come from an early misunderstanding of how the brain stores information. It’s a LOT more complicated and frankly, barely understood.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, accurately simulating a single pyramidal neuron requires an eight-layer deep neural network:

https://www.cell.com/neuron/pdf/S0896-6273(21)00501-8.pdf

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

that was an interesting read, thank you

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s a LOT more complicated and frankly, barely understood.

Yet you confidently state that the brain doesn't work the way LLMs do?

Obviously it doesn't work exactly the same way that LLMs do, if only because of the completely different substrates. But when you get to more nebulous concepts like "creativity" and "inspiration" it's not so clear.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

people have a definite fear of being defined as machines... not sure why we think were so special..

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

so its barely understood, but this definitely is not it. got it.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (62 replies)