this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
551 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3767 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Engineers at MIT and in China are aiming to turn seawater into drinking water with a completely passive device that is inspired by the ocean, and powered by the sun.

In a paper appearing today in the journal Joule, the team outlines the design for a new solar desalination system that takes in saltwater and heats it with natural sunlight.

The researchers estimate that if the system is scaled up to the size of a small suitcase, it could produce about 4 to 6 liters of drinking water per hour and last several years before requiring replacement parts. At this scale and performance, the system could produce drinking water at a rate and price that is cheaper than tap water.

https://www.cell.com/joule/fulltext/S2542-4351(23)00360-4

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (62 children)

Article doesn't mention what the unit does with the salt waste.

I support this 100%, but desalination presents a unique problem: what do we do with all the salt? Maybe the unit uses it for something, but otherwise it just miniaturizes a problem that we're already working on.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don’t you just dump it back in the sea? Diluting should make this a minor issue right?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's what I always thought, but the local effects of hypersalinated water can be terrible for any nearby life

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Create some sort of Dead Sea salt bath / salt therapy place where people can float in the saline waters or something for cheap. Then flood a converted parking lot with the saltwater and dry it off for ~~rusting cars~~ deicing roads on the east coast.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is mostly a scale dependent issue. The size of this unit means it’s probably not a concern unless you ended up making thousands of them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats the big ecological question. If we do this at scale, we'll be releasing more briny water back into the sea than we take. Over time on industrial scales, what will this do to the oceans? Is the increased salinity negligible, even at large scales? Or will it cause marine wildlife to die out?

Think of it this way. Burning a pile of wood generates CO2. So first burning a bunch of gas or coal. A couple campfires won't make a dent on the atmospheric composition. It's only when we go this en masse and at industrial scales that we add appreciable CO2 to the atmosphere and cause global warming.

The ideal way to handle desalination would be for us to use the salt that's produced, so the concentration in the ocean remains unchanged with respect to desalination.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the water is all being returned to the ocean rather quickly. It’s not quite the same with CO2.

There’s some localized issues to deal with, but it’s not going to be a global salinity increase as we aren’t changing the form of the water and storing it, like the polar ice does.

So in fact, the ocean should already be desalinating slightly from the melting ice caps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I thought about the ice caps, yeah. It's just something that warrants long term monitoring and observation.

load more comments (59 replies)