this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1224 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

68639 readers
3680 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
1224
OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair use (arstechnica.com)
submitted 4 weeks ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
498 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 13 points 4 weeks ago (16 children)

How many pages has a human author read and written before they can produce something worth publishing? I’m pretty sure that’s not even a million pages. Why does an AI require a gazillion pages to learn, but the quality is still unimpressive? I think there’s something fundamentally wrong with the way we teach these models.

[–] mimavox@lemm.ee -1 points 4 weeks ago (11 children)

The more important question is: Why can a human absorb a ton of material in their learning without anyone crying about them "stealing"? Why shouldn't the same go for AI? What's the difference? I really don't understand the common mindset here. Is it because a trained AI is used for profit?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)

It is because a human artist is usually inspired and uses knowledge to create new art and AI is just a mediocre mimic. A human artist doesn't accidentally put six fingers on people on a regular basis. If they put fewer fingers it is intentional.

[–] mimavox@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's where I don't agree. I don't subscribe to the view that LLMs merely are "stochastic parrots".

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What do you think they are if not that?

They don't have emotions, they don't have individual motivations, and don't have intent.

[–] mimavox@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago

No. But I do think they mimick the language capacity in the human brain.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)