this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
73 points (83.5% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (13 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It was until you hit the part in the article about using AI voice generation to target ads. When election season rolls around, we'll get all sorts of clips of people endorsing Trump without their knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That could already happen with AI technology from months ago. This is not news.

The targeted ads will be that if you follow specific broadcasts, you will get an higher chance to get an ad voiced by a person in that podcast. AI has little to do here, could have always been done.

Unfortunately its use in the US politics its inevitable, with what I am understanding since i've started to follow it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

The dangerous part is that it sounds like the ad is generated by Spotify.

In the "tech already exists" scenario, an advertising firm will have to guess at the voice people want to hear and submit their own audio files to advertise.

If this works the way it sounds, the ad firm sends in some text and Spotify generates a voice ad based on who you listen to. Less effort on the advertising firm and far more targeted.

Both are bad. The second is worse!

And frankly, it's another reason not to support Spotify. You are supposed to be paying to listen to music, not support research into this bullshit advertising.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There's a difference between being able to technically do this, and deploying it as a product with legal checks and scaled up infrastructure.

Since the article was about generative voice models, I assumed the ad part was also about that, but you're right it might just be using voice recognition.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)