this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
646 points (96.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

32472 readers
806 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

One of the things that really, really annoys me when I get lazy and use a pre-bundled set of (neo)vim plugins is how every one of them uses mouse functionality. I only use the mouse to copy/paste from the terminal to system clipboard. I don't want it hijacking him and entering visual mode.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

pee bundled neovim add-ons might as well use helix.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You know, if I can use vim bindings and regex, I might try it out. I tend to try to keep my neovim plugins fairly lightweight when I config myself. Not being electron is a big plus.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

yah helix has vim motions.

their search mode and select is a bit different but once you do the tutorial it makes complete sense why youd want to scope your regex replace.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

What stopped me personally was reading they use a different order of operations, so to say. Where vim goes action + range, helix goes (or at least used to go) range + action (like replacing ci" by i"c). Mb that makes more sense for them, but I'm too lazy to re-learn that for no particular reason

load more comments (6 replies)