Technology

59287 readers

5168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

405

Update: Bitwarden posted to X this evening to reaffirm that it's a "packaging bug" and that "Bitwarden remains committed to the open source licensing model." (www.phoronix.net)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is an update to a post that was previously shared in the community: Concerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 171 points 3 weeks ago (17 children)

Even if they are backtracking with egg on their face, this is good. Maybe better. Now they know they can’t get away with this stuff.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Man, I really hate seeing comments like this. I feel like I need to reiterate that BitWarden is NOT an open-source company. They are committed to providing open-source compatible products with their products. Two very different things.

If they feel their product is somehow lacking or affected by whatever they are packaging right now, they are completely free to change it. They also have no barriers to entry for users who wish to use another client.

It's really not a big deal.

load more comments (12 replies)