Technology

59347 readers

5840 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

662

Google is Killing uBlock Origin. No Chromium Browser is Safe. (www.quippd.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

274 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We’ve been anticipating it for years, and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the extension will soon no longer be available because it “doesn’t follow the best practices for Chrome extensions”.

Now that it is finally happening, many seem to be oddly resigned to the idea that Google is taking away the best and most powerful ad content blocker available on any web browser today, with one article recommending people set up a DNS based content blocker on their network 😒 – instead of more obvious solutions.

I may not have blogged about this but I recently read an article from 1999 about why Gopher lost out to the Web, where Christopher Lee discusses the importance of the then-novel term “mind share” and how it played an important part in dictating why the web won out. In my last post, I touched on the importance of good information to democracies – the same applies to markets (including the browser market) – and it seems to me that we aren’t getting good information about this topic.

This post is me trying to give you that information, to help increase the mind share of an actual alternative. Enjoy!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 98 points 4 weeks ago (43 children)

Finally made the switch to Firefox just 2 days ago. Great so far.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (22 children)

No, HVEC / H.265 codec support so no modern 4K security camera or plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support

H265 isn't the only option there. AV1 is great and fully supported by Jellyfin (and I imagine Plex?)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

H.265 is the defecto standard on Security cameras, and I am not going to migrate content to AV1 that is already in H.265.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Use VLC to view the video feed for your cams, better experience overall for that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Not when you are using an NVR with scrubbing and everything in the web UI. https://frigate.video/

All in all it would be an inconvenient workaround for something that already works seamlessly across Safari, Edge, Chrome etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

damn dude, all you do is bitch. maybe get a different camera setup.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

How is giving a sober and straightforward explanation of why he can’t use Firefox “bitching”? The simple fact is “switch to Firefox” isn’t a solution for everyone in every case. Burying your head in the sand about that benefits nobody.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

They can enjoy some ads then, I guess. But it was the general attitude of unwillingness to entertain suggestions and just shutting down every one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

It is generally hard to have an opposing opinion or need discussion on the internet without people feeling attacked and start name calling.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 weeks ago

Na man I have modern 4k cameras, I need a modern browser.. They have literally build chipsets around this and many standards call for h.264 or h.265. That isn't changing.

Mozilla decided over 8 years ago not to support HVEC because of patents..

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1332136

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Jellyfin can handle the transcoding to AV1 where needed. Albeit that's a bit less ideal than direct play as you need the hardware to transcode.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not spending hundreds to upgrade my server to support 4K to 4K transcoding. Even accelerated on a VERY recent CPU or GPU Encoding in AV1 is costly while at the same time decoding H.265.

Again Essentially every major browser supports HVEC now, other than Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

If it's a personal machine in which you have a choice on browser why not just use one of the native Jellyfin apps?

major browser supports HVEC now, other than Firefox.

Every other major browser is an overcommercialized pile of crap (or built atop the same) that can afford to pay for the licenses to use HEVC or has no qualms shipping proprietary code with their software that they don't control.

Also apparently on Windows you can enable experimental HEVC hardware decoding support. You'll need to install "HEVC Video Extensions" (from Microsoft themselves) ($0.99) in the Windows App Store and toggle "media.wmf.hevc.enabled" in about:config.

load more comments (20 replies)

load more comments (40 replies)