this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
326 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59287 readers
6276 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (8 children)

No thanks. We don't need rich people living forever.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Might be the only way to get them to give a shit about the environment.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I doubt it. They will just dump shit further away. If their solution default is to make things "somebody else's problem" there's no reason to believe they will stop thinking that way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That might be their outlook on "local" pollution for a while, but you don't think going from 20 years left to centuries to live might affect their opinions on global climate change?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not really. Many of them are already heavily invested in life extension tech (not that I think it will work, but it means they're optimistic). I think their general worldview is that technology will fix it, at least for them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I'm probably being too optimistic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)