this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
105 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

34904 readers
1207 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sept 18 (Reuters) - A group of 18 state attorneys general said on Monday they backed Montana's effort to ban Chinese-owned short video app TikTok, urging a U.S. judge to reject legal challenges ahead of the Jan. 1 effective date.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

It's wild to me how many people with seemingly liberal values are cheering on the US government telling them what apps they can and can't use to get and share information. Banning it on government devices is fine, banning it outright seems like a huge 1st amendment violation and assault on democratic values. The government has no business telling you what you can listen to or say, many people have died for us to have that right and we shouldn't give it away just because we're scared of election interference or spying or whatever it is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be true if they were banning it because they didn't like it. But I believe the growing concern is that it is a national security concern. Like the Chinese government is spying through the app.

Someone correct me if I am wrong. I haven't looked into this at all, just repeating what I have heard.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're getting spied on via all our apps. If the concern was really privacy, congress should enact some GDPR-like privacy legislation that applied equally to all companies and levies fines against them for non-compliance. But they aren't doing that. This is just a bunch of hot air that is used to reduce our liberties. Same as when they say laws are "for the children" but all they really do is restrict online speech, take away your right to privacy, etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they don't care about spying unless it's the Chinese government, because that's what makes it a national security issue.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

So ban it on government devices. China spying on me personally has no national security implications. That goes the same for pretty much every other American citizen. Add to that, most other apps are spying in the same way and then re-selling that data globally to the highest bidder. It's not about national security. Pushes to infringe on our rights never have been, that's just the excuse they use.

load more comments (2 replies)