this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
1212 points (98.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32041 readers
1429 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (24 children)

Strong competition from yaml and json on this point however

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Alright, the YAML spec is a dang mess, that I'll grant you, but it seems pretty easy for my human eyes to read and write. As for JSON -- seriously? That's probably the easiest to parse human-readable structured data format there is!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't know much apart from the basics of YAML, what makes it complicated for computers to parse?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

the spec is 10 chapters. everything is unquoted by default, so parsers must be able to guess the data type of every value, and will silently convert them if they are, but leave them alone otherwise. there are 63 possible combinations of string type. "no" and "on" are both valid booleans. it supports sexagesimal numbers for some reason, using the colon as a separator just like for objects. other things of this nature.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, the classic "no" problem of YAML. But the addition of the comments is very nice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)