Technology

59390 readers

2617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

570

Brazilian court orders suspension of Elon Musk’s X after it missed deadline (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Late on Friday afternoon, Justice Alexandre de Moraes – who has been engaged in a dispute with X’s owner, Elon Musk, since April – ordered the “immediate, complete and total suspension of X’s operations” in the country, “until all court orders … are complied with, fines are duly paid, and a new legal representative for the company is appointed in the country”.

He gave Brazil’s National Telecommunications Agency 24 hours to enforce the decision. Once notified, the agency must pass the order on to the more than 20,000 broadband internet providers in the country, each of which must block X.

In an interview with the TV channel Globonews, the agency’s president, Carlos Manuel Baigorri, said the order had already been passed on to internet providers.

“Since we’re talking about more than 20,000 companies, each will have its own implementation time, but … we expect that probably over the weekend all companies will be able to implement the block,” he said.

Justice Moraes also summoned Apple and Google to “implement technological barriers to prevent the use of the X app by users of the iOS and Android systems” and to block the use of virtual private network (VPN) applications.

The decision imposes a daily fine of R$50,000 (£6,800) on individuals and companies that attempt to continue using X via VPN.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 months ago (16 children)

sounds feasible except the "blocking the use of vpn apps" part?

[+] [email protected] -8 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Why? VPN is not a magic bullet. Wait, did you believe their marketing??

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

can you elaborate?

as it is, your comment is not comprehensible. Why what? Whose marketing? Marketing for VPN? "Magic bullet" for what purpose?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

VPNs can be blocked by governments or worse, the data can be decrypted giving you a false sense of security. In any case if the governments wants to it can easily see if you connect to a VPN and give you trouble just for that. Same goes for TOR.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

TOR, you write. How are they going to block TOR?

when a government blocks one vpn server, another sprouts in its place. Not like some governments aren't trying. Yes, they "give trouble" to some people in some places for VPN or TOR use but that may be preferable to those people, compared to what they may have to go through if their connection wasn't encrypted.

here the question was about blocking VPNetworks to prevent Xitter use and that sounded implausible (the judge also understood this afterwards).

VPNs can be blocked by governments or worse, the data can be decrypted giving you a false sense of security.

How would they decrypt this data without having access to the VPN server itself (or probably your device)?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The handful of people so addicted and desperate for xitter that they turn to TOR to get their daily dose of poison can probably just be ignored.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Never said they can block TOR. They run TOR entry nodes as honeypots. They run “cool looking” VPN servers as honeypots. They definitely have backdoors for many encrypted services. Dude, this isn’t 2005 anymore.

And don’t forget, authorities can and will use just metadata (what you connected to when) to prosecute you without ever caring what you actually transmitted.

But go ahead and call me clueless, I am not trying to educate here. Just annoyed that people trust these technologies so much without really understanding how they get caught.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Never said they can block TOR

that's what my first comment you replied to was . I wrote that blocking VPN (or TOR) wasn't feasible

VPNs can be blocked by governments or worse, the data can be decrypted giving you a false sense of security. In any case if the governments wants to it can easily see if you connect to a VPN and give you trouble just for that. Same goes for TOR.

👆

They run “cool looking” VPN servers as honeypots. They definitely have backdoors for many encrypted services. Dude, this isn’t 2005 anymore.

some authorities try to use metadata for prosecution, yes, but it doesn't suffice. They have to correlate undeniably that metadata and whatever information they may have collected from other nonencrypted platforms.

one entry node on TOR that collects the crumbles that passes through this node… good luck to anybody trying to make sense of that mess.

But go ahead and call me clueless, I am not trying to educate here. Just annoyed that people trust these technologies so much without really understanding how they get caught.

I've been following these cases for years now, you write "i'm not trying to educate", but it seems like you're trying to inform the clueless among us about the dangers of using VPN or TOR. With a claim like that, it would be nice to have some reliable sources linked in your comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe you should provide sources for your hilarious stance that VPNs and TOR provide absolute protection for anyone in any situation. I guess the l33t hax0rz influencers you follow on TikTok told you to think that so now you want to defend VPNs and TOR against all critical thought wherever you can, and that’s cute as fuck, but those people are only trying to sell their VPN to you. Don’t be so naive, or are you 12?