this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
438 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3125 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No evidence that UFOs are aliens — NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific::NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Did nasa release any evidence supporting the human traffiking and the other issue you mention? because they have not said it's not real. NASA already made official statements acknowledging that there are uaps all over the world, they are now saying that they don't have evidence that it's aliens. they have not said it's not real we have passed that point.

source: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/pentagon-nasa-no-earthly-idea-164000079.html

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (14 children)

"There is no evidence to support that conclusion" is scientist for "no."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, it's not. It's scientist for we don't know.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're missing his point. It's not not knowing, it's "current empirical evidence points to X conclusion".

Science is always open to changing their conclusion based on new evidence. People take that as doubt while con-men bring them absolute answers with absolute confidence and mistake this for facts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Sorry if I expressed my thoughts all wrong. But that's what I meant, that science always awaits new evidence.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)