this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
586 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59347 readers
4401 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

So in the end, they is an internal contradiction in capitalism. It just append to be collapse due to lack of ressources and dumb management

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It just append to be collapse due to lack of ressources and dumb management

TIL reverting the direction of Siberian rivers and turning Kazakh steppe into agricultural land were capitalist projects.

This one is a contradiction of highly hierarchical and degenerate systems.

With capitalism the contradiction is old and well known - power bends rules. Bent rules cause degeneracy. Degeneracy causes degradation and collapse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Got me interested enough to Google, maybe you should too

Research and planning work on the project started in the 1930s and was carried out on a large scale in the 1960s through the early 1980s. The controversial project was abandoned in 1986, primarily for environmental reasons, without much actual construction work ever done.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

If you mean the rivers part, then yes.

If you mean the steppe part, then no, they've caused a few ecological catastrophes first before stopping.

load more comments (4 replies)