this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
236 points (96.5% liked)

Privacy

31939 readers
540 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi, my post is focusing specifically on YouTube since I observed the following categories have less intrusive solutions or privacy focused solutions, even if they are paid:

  • Operating Systems (Linux, for example)
  • Instant Messaging (Element, for example)
  • Community Messaging (Revolt, for example)
  • E-Mail (Proton, for example)
  • Office (libreoffice, for example)
  • Password Managers (Bitwarden, for example)

However, how do we distribute videos and watch them without data collection? I am NOT asking how do I use a privacy-focused front-end for YouTube, by the way, I am aware they exist.

I am wondering how we obtain a FOSS solution to something super critical such as YouTube. It is critical since it contains a lot of educational content (I'd wager more than any other platform), and arguably the most informative platform, despite having to filter through a lot of trash. During COVID, we even saw lecturers from universities upload their content on YouTube and telling students to watch those lectures. (I have first-hand experience with this at a respectable university).

I refuse to accept that there is nothing we can do about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (10 children)

People use YouTube because YouTube pays them. You want to get paid without a middleman; you have to use cryptocurrency. The Fediverse hates crypto, so the Fediverse will never have a YouTube replacement.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

What exactly would prevent people from paying in actual currencies? Crypto is in no way a requirement for a YT replacement whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

What exactly would prevent people from paying in actual currencies? Crypto is in no way a requirement for a YT replacement whatsoever.

You want to get paid without a middleman

This is the part you missed. Imagine Lemmy but for videos instead of links. Users pay creators via some subscription or likes mechanism. Lemmy instance admins do not want to deal with:

  • Custodying the funds and having to keep them safe
  • Having to make connections to every major national banking system or payment processor
  • Dealing with chargebacks, payment disputes, counterparty risks, KYC/AML/other onerous regulations etc. People are used to cards being "instant" but full settlement on the backend takes days to weeks depending on how you define "settlement".

Doing these things is an absolute nightmare and takes a lot of human time. Human time costs lots of money. All this just to move money from viewers to content creators.

Bitcoin via lightning, for example, can do all of this for them without any of that mess. Payments can go P2P directly from viewers to creators. Payments can be settled instantly for <1% in fees, usually pennies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

There are many payment services that require pretty much nothing from the server/instance once implemented, and doesn't cost anything for the instance (the fees are taken from the payer), specifically to address the issues you mention. It's already a solved issue.

With bitcoin everyone now has to go to an exchange to convert the pseudo-currency to actual usable currencies, which is a much more annoying middleman IMO, which will then also take a cut.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

And what are the fees like on those services? Does their fee structure work for micropayments? And do they support every country out-of-the box or are there some they don't support? How do they handle chargebacks and counter-party risk? What is their settlement time? Do they occasionally freeze accounts for seemingly nonsensical or political reasons? Since we're on the privacy community, how is their privacy? Can you, for example, sign up as an instance admin and automatically have them forward payments to content creators, or would you need to custom-code that through an API and then register with a non-standard account because now you aren't a regular user but an intermediary? Try being an "intermediary" on Paypal and your account will get shut down very quickly, because you aren't allowed to do that. You'd have to custom negotiate a special deal with them and fill out a bunch more paperwork and probably pay higher fees and meet a bunch of other requirements like being incorporated and obtaining insurance and auditors and the list goes on and on.

Ask anybody in the adult industry how much trouble they have getting access to these services even though the business they are engaging in is perfectly legal. Not grey area legal, fully certified legal by the US Supreme Court and appellate courts up and down the system for decades.

Answer these questions and you start to see the appeal of not having a third-party custodian do all this. Bitcoin lightning can do all of this, instantly, for 10-1000x less fees and massively less complication. You can say you don't like crypto, that's fine, but it's legitimately better at solving these kinds of problems which is why adoption has been growing for 15 straight years.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But it's not objectively better, because you can't fucking use it. It's digital tokens that are literally unusable until exchanged for real currencies, which brings the need for exchanges in to the picture (see my edit above).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You don't have to convert it to fiat if you don't want to, plenty of people use Bitcoin as currency, that is the entire point. Users tipped each other nearly a million USD worth of it on nostr int he last two months ($950k). You can go to any major city and find place to buy/sell/spend it. Many places online accept it too, of course. The network effect is quite large. Bitcoin's market cap is larger than sweden's GDP. It moves trillions of dollars of value every year. Not people "hodling", people using it to do funds transfer.

But if you want to, you can absolutely convert it, with a single click. Those middlemen typically take a lower cut since they're doing conversion not sending/receiving/settlement which is a much risker and therefore expensive service. There is, for example, no counterparty risk if you convert somebody's BTC to their native currency, but there is if you transfer that person's money to another person or act as an intermediary. I use strike for this, strike's conversion fee is less than 1%, in many apps or exchanges, conversion is literally free because the app wants to incentivize you to store money with them and because it's just updating some row in a database.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Except for less than a handful of countries worldwide, bitcoin can't pay your rent, your mortgage, your groceries, your gas, your tuition or anything in day-to-day life. It is effectively not usable as payment for basic things yet, you would die if that was all you had.

I can spend money (even digitally) without any fees at all, no functional delay (as in, I'm not bothered by the technical delay), no need to convert it and wait for the fiat to be paid out to me from an exchange. that is not doable with crypto.

Crypto may get there one day, but it is still very far from being there after 15 years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

then the bank could stop processing your payments because they don't like your content

load more comments (7 replies)