this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
399 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
2520 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
399
Adobe Says It Won’t Train AI Using Artists’ Work. Creatives Aren’t Convinced (www.wired.com)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 80 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

I know some artists don't mind it, but I just can't hear the word "creatives" as anything other than silicon valley speak for the source of the content they sell. It feels dehumanizing.

Particularly in this case, it's Adobe, so you can just call them artists, designers, photographers, etc.

Or, ya know, just users.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In fairness, it’s Wired who called them creatives, while Adobe called them artists.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's pretty bad. It's like calling people "the talent".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Or calling all kinds of art "content".

load more comments (3 replies)