Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54577 readers

264 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

279

Is It Farewell To The Internet Archive? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Another one is close to biting the dust. Sci-Hub is out, Z-Lib got ran off like a dog and now IA is going to remove a host of books because these publishers just can't stop being money-hungry bastards.

This is why I support piracy. Knowledge should be free. To go after a nonprofit organization that just wants to make digital books and other formats accessible to everyone when majority of uploads can't be downloaded only borrowed, is just so devious and greedy.

I'm so tired of it. Laws around copyright and intellectual property need to be reformed. I feel so helpless :c

Link to blog post:

https://blog.archive.org/2023/08/17/what-the-hachette-v-internet-archive-decision-means-for-our-library/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Internet Archiv will go .onion

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That only helps for shadow libraries whose operators are unknown. The Internet Archive, on the other hand, is a registered non-profit organisation, so how would they be able to hide themselves?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just like the OG Pirate Bay. They closed down, and someone else, unknown, took over.

That's not unproblematic ofc as the new owner can do whatever they want without the oversight of the non-profit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It'd be harder for IA since they have hundreds of PBs of hard drives. You need like a warehouse for it so it's a lot harder to hop around

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could give the entire data as download and others could take over

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It's not so simple, unfortunately. The sheer amount of data they have - 212 PB as of December 2021 - makes it practically impossible for most people to mirror. Unless they physically hand over all 745 server nodes to another operator, there's no way of someone

There are some solutions to this - for example Archive-Team has proposed a method of mirroring the Internet Archive using distributed clients, although this method currently only has a fraction of the total dataset. Still, at this point in time, there's no real solution to resharing IA's data in the event they go under

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how would they be able to hide themselves?

It's literally in the name for a .onion website: hidden service

Tor hides the identity of servers just as much as it does for client users. So as long as the IA hosts in a country where publishers don't have jurisdiction, I believe they'll be fine

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Customs and emigration will notice the hundreds of server racks on a boat

load more comments (5 replies)