Technology

59390 readers

4322 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

468

Google's "Manifest V2" Chrome extension phaseout next month is expected to impact the original uBlock Origin extension, which still uses the V2 framework and has 37 million users (www.theregister.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

98 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The new MV3 architecture reflects Google's avowed desire to make browser extensions more performant, private, and secure. But the internet giant's attempt to do so has been bitterly contested by makers of privacy-protecting and content-blocking extensions, who have argued that the Chocolate Factory's new software architecture will lead to less effective privacy and content-filtering extensions.

For users of uBlock Origin, which runs on Manifest V2, "options" means using the less capable uBlock Origin Lite, which supports Manifest V3.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (16 children)

What do you mean by that?
(I'm a filthy casual)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (15 children)

It just has a crap load of software packages it depends on to work properly (though a number of them seem like fonts). I have reasonably fast computer, and it's been compiling for about 45 minutes at this point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (12 children)

Ah compile... guess I'll stick with regular Firefox. There are some magiks I don't tamper with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

You don't need to compile it. There's a librewolf-bin package which provides a precompiled binary, or you can use the Flatpak.

load more comments (11 replies)

load more comments (13 replies)