this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
105 points (88.9% liked)

Technology

59421 readers
5045 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

So, first, that's just a reduction. But set that aside, and let's talk big picture here.

My GPU can use something like 400 watts.

A human is about 100 watts constant power consumption.

So even setting aside all other costs of a human and only paying attention to direct energy costs, if an LLM running on my GPU can do something in under a quarter the time I can, then it's more energy-efficient.

I won't say that that's true for all things, but there are definitely things that Stable Diffusion or the like can do today in a whole lot less than a quarter the time it would take me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Chat GPT can output an article in a much shorter time than it'd take me to write one but people would probably like mine more

load more comments (7 replies)