this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
371 points (99.2% liked)

Privacy

31975 readers
226 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I don't agree with the prerequisite of "doesn't have a maintained version" because I don't feel like that makes a difference with the premise of specifically running older software, whether it has a new version available or not.

But anyways... I will try to adhere to that anyways, and use Ubuntu as an example as that's what I use.

7yuv: This and every Qt4 app for example no longer runs because Ubuntu 20.04 and above (and probably many other distros) does not provide it anymore. 7yuv is still available for download, but has not been updated, and does not run on my current 22.04 box.

Dia: Same story here. No longer developed. The remaining binary deb package was built for Ubuntu 12.04 and no longer runs due to a dependency on libpng12 (the current version is 16). Yes I could possibly recompile from source if the API hasn't changed, but the discussion was specifically about running older binaries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Got 7yuv running on Linux Mint in under 15 minutes. If you consider using Docker to be cheating, consider me a cheater, but I stand by my statement that this is a niche problem affecting a niche group of users, there are even easy solutions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think it can even be called cheating because the discussion was about forward compatibility. Using a container to house old libraries is something completely different in my opinion and I think it defeats the whole point of the word "compatibility" in my argument. Many users would not know how to do this nor want to. Where do you draw the line? CPU emulation?

We can disagree on this and that's fine. I just still don't consider it "highly disingenuous", but maybe a difference of opinion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think making hay out of this problem when it's a niche case nothing burger, especially in a thread full of linux hate, is... Call it what ever you want but...

As I said earlier, I wasn't trying to be insulting, you were coming across in a certain way in the context you were posting in.

Linux has always been a DIY operating system, for very good reason. The compatibility decisions you're talking about were made for very good reasons. There's an easy solution, anyone having this problem (SUPER rare for most users) can reach out and use.