this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
1403 points (99.4% liked)

xkcd

8839 readers
9 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://xkcd.com/2932

Alt text:

This PSA brought to you by several would-be assassins who tried to wave me in front of speeding cars in the last month and who will have to try harder next time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Very normal when small sidestreets are intersecting with larger roads.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

45 mph multilane traffic, with unsignalized intersection of cross traffic? No, it's a shitty design. Just because it's normal where you live, doesn't mean it's a good design.

How to fix? Just a few examples...

  • Signalize intersection
  • Slow down thru traffic
  • Roundabout
  • Reduce thru lanes, increase turn lane offset
  • Prevent left turns from side street
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Not every side street is worthy of building out a whole intersection for, or slowing down traffic for. Maybe if there actually is that much traffic turning left, but I suspect if that were the case it's likely at very specific times of day. And what, are you going to restrict cars off the side street to turning right and then making a u-turn? That's not better, especially if it's a long way to the next intersection.

This is just a common as dirt configuration, especially in rural areas. I don't find it remarkable at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Rural areas shouldn't be this busy. This design is fine as long as it's quiet, but it would take 1 more car waiting to turn left to back up the whole upbound road.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)