this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
458 points (92.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32472 readers
589 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (6 children)

I mean, I certainly wouldn't give someone else shit for using ligatures, but personally, I don't like them, because:

  • they break with monospacedness. Everything is in a nice grid and you've randomly got these character combinations that needlessly stick out.
  • they sometimes happen in places where they really shouldn't.
  • they hide what the actual characters are. Especially, if go to edit that code, my brain will really struggle for a split-second when there's a '≠', then I delete one character and rather than the whole thing disappearing, I'm left with a '!'.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Do you also get surprised when you backspace a tab and suddenly it removes more whitespace than 1 characters worth?

Or did you learn it fast and really never think about it?

I think it's more a "getting used to" thing, that once learned, you don't think about, but it makes things more readable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Sure, I could get used to it. But it being more readable is not even true for me, because the thing I got used to instead, is that != is the unequals-operator. I see that much more often than .

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Studies show that ligatures improve readability, but I acknowledge that it's likely untrue for outliers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

For monospace fonts? I've heard of such research for proportional fonts, where ligatures definitely make sense to me. But yeah, I wouldn't assume such research to automatically translate to monospace.

load more comments (2 replies)