Technology

34889 readers

126 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

338

Windows 11 will reportedly display a watermark if your PC does not support AI requirements (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

128 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Imagine unironically defending Microsoft making their product shittier

Maybe they should just make the OS work on any computer? Kinda seems like they're shooting themselves in the foot, yeah?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I'm only addressing that last line, but really think it through. Should you really expect, or even want, an OS that runs on a 386? It wasn't that long ago that most Linux distros could. But they all moved away from it because that limited performance on anything more modern.

The newer instruction sets are created for a reason, and that reason is typically higher performance. If the OS (or any code, really) can use them, it will work better. But if you can't or don't, the code will be more compatible.

There also isn't "any" computer; it's simply not a thing. The question becomes how old (more technically, what minimum specs) do you want to support, and performance you want to be limited by?

While I agree that Microsoft has leaned too heavily into newer hardware as an expectation, there's definitely a line to be drawn.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if you are overthinking, by trying to equate a 386 with a top of the line only a few years old.

Or if you under-thought, buy not going back to a 286, or an XT, or a mainframe.

Or that you are in lala land by not including Macs on a Power PC chip.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

My point was, where do you draw the line? Any answer is equally arbitrary. MS drew it at 8th Gen Intel Core. Would 6th Gen have been the right answer? 3rd? Core 2 Duo? All of them can run Win 10 just fine, and can (at least technically, and for today) run Win11.