this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
46 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

34894 readers
686 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

with an x86 license

doesn't that still mean they are dependent on the West technically?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

In it's roots, yes. But the architecture isn't banned, just the chips. As an analogy, China can make its own internal combustion engines and not buy Ford cars.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I meant, if they require a license to keep making x86 chips, what's to stop Intel/the US from revoking it later on?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

At this point the licencing is only about Intel getting money, not about China being allowed to produce the chips, me thinks