YourAvgMortal

That sounds expensive. They’d rather change the law. Again.

While this could be a good idea in theory, I guess in practice many people will be dishonest and just vote for whomever they wanted from the beginning

Of course there is! They could spend more money in PR campaigns and ~bribes~ lobbying

I’m all in favour of prosecuting Google for it’s search monopoly, but Trump only cares about using the monopoly in his own favour

Given that neither twitch nor YouTube will let you, you should look at Owncast; but I don’t know about a particular server for that

I’m sure they understand the problems, and they understand that solving them would eat into their profits

Meta made a twitter clone when they had the chance, they’ll happily make a YouTube clone.

I don’t think Amazon or Microsoft are very interested in entering that market, but they are the only ones with the money and compute to support such a platform.

Maybe Netflix could be interested? But I doubt it

Wasm comes to mind, execution time in the browser will probably be ok, but size is a big deal

All the songs I have copied to iTunes get uploaded, but if you have the lossless versions they get converted to normal quality on other devices, or if you remove the local original copy.

Music doesn’t support flac, though, you have to convert them to alac first.

I also use a Mac, I don’t know if it’s different on windows

The real problem is they didn’t play the “think of the children” card. Then the government would leave them alone

Can you elaborate why? I’m curious

The article is behind the Adblock banner. You could use reader mode (if you have it), or block the banner itself