null_dot

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I don't even see the code. All I see is heading, emphasis, dot-points ...

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 hours ago (8 children)

I just don't see the point of obsidian et al.

Just use a directory structure and save markdown files in it.

There are many apps that are great editors for this structure on every platform. IDK exactly what obsidian does but many editors have zettelkasten (fancy cross links) functionality, just no fancy graph.

Ghostty + helix is the sexxy RN.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Hol up. Are notes stored in files in a directory structure or a single file? Just that you said "the file" so I'm wondering.

If so, that's lock in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

That's the whole point of markdown lmfao.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah.

Sadly I think email will be with us for the foreseeable future. It's broken, sure... but it's just so fundamental to the web.

An alternative would need to be ubiquitous, and that seems unachievable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't think the SPF / DKIM / DMARC stuff is overly complex nor the core of the problem.

In my case it was recipients with bonkers microsoft exchange servers that just had weird ideas about who should be sending them emails.

For example, one thing that tripped me up forever ago was grey listing. Apparently the receiving server just wouldn't acknowledge the sending server for an arbitrary period of time, say 12 hours or so. Spam senders would usually give up long before then, while a legit server would keep trying because it's legitimately trying to deliver an actual email.

So my email-in-a-box type self hosted set up was fine really. Compliant you might say. But to send emails to this one in a thousand recipient I had to investigate what was going on and reconfigure things to ensure their server would interact with mine.

Another thing that can happen is that spammers just put your email address in the "from" field and fire off a few million emails. Obviously the DKIM signatures and SPF won't match but it still just makes your future legitimate emails look spammy. Having the credibility of a larger organisation goes a long way in this type of instance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I'm absolutely in the "don't self-host email" camp. That said, I think it could be done reliably if you wanted to use someone else's SMTP server and let them worry about deliverability. As in, have your mx records on your domain route to your MTA and dovecot, but set your DKIM and SPF records to match a third party SMTP server. You could use mxroute as an SMTP server very cheaply. There are others like the email API type services. I still can't think of why I'd want to self host with all this drama but just an idea I've heard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Indeed.

The whole mess seems to have gotten so much worse.

12
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Edit: nevermind. Turns out my email host is already running spamassassin and I can configure it how I wish.

My email is hosted at mxroute. I'm happy with their pricing and service and don't want to selfhost my email. However, their spam management isn't great.

I just realised that it might be possible to run spamassassin myself, which will set spam headers on the emails which my email client (thunderbird) can then use to decide what to do.

There seems to be a bunch of poorly maintained / abandoned ways in which to do this. I thought I'd ask here just in case any one else is doing this and can help me skip to the end.

I was hoping for a docker container (or compose stack) that provides an IMAP proxy and runs spamassassin.

Any ideas and insights welcome. My email juggling could use some improvement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

For sure there are plenty of people that don't produce any real value in their work, but that's been the case since forever and they're hard to weed out because in some ways their full time job is to ensure their ongoing employment.

As in most things, it's a question of extent.

The most accurate statement you can make is that AI will make "most" office employees "more" efficient.

The thing is, this has been happening with every technological advance for hundreds of years.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

There's no evidence that "more advanced AI" is going to emerge in the next few years.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Sorry this is just plain wrong and there's no evidence of this at all.

People have been saying this since the invention of the comptometer.

Anyone who's job can be replaced by an LLM isnt producing any value.

For the rest of us it's an incremental improvement at best.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I don't think it's surprising at all that you've never heard of a Dyson sphere. It's not a very popular idea even in science fiction.

view more: next ›