My guess was that this law was going to permit something as simple as pixel matching. Honestly I don't imagine they can codify in the law something more sophisticated. Companies don't want false positives either, at the very least due to profits.
eveninghere
joined 6 months ago
Is there a source stating that they're going to require these?
They say they the images are merely matched to pre-determined images found on the web. You're talking about a different scenario where AI detects inappropriate contents in an image.
They say they the images are merely matched to pre-determined images found on the web. You're talking about a different scenario where AI detects inappropriate contents in an image.
Yes, I agree it is dangerous. I just wanted to assess the actual threat (current and future) before jumping onto the wagon.
I think proton was never going to function as a profit-first business. Too many enshittified rival businesses. Kinda the natural outcome.
Maybe we'll all become AI training data and receive universal basic income.
I'd just drag the time seeker though...
Not precise. They can dynamically generate the video stream from the ad-free original.
I don't think Apple is planning that. For now they're trying the approach to expose metadata like email headers to their AI, but that such data has been already accessible to the search functionality anyway.
It's very different from Recall, which dumps screen capture of webpages and passwords into a database file that's only protected by access rights.
Source? Does the law require that? That's not my impression.