this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
17 points (94.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54476 readers
811 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

See linked posting. I've commented there with a link to a CLI tool in Python that allows downloading of IA collections. I've submitted a patch to enable specifying start and end points so that it's easier to resume downloading a huge collection, or to allow multiple people to split up the work.

https://archive.org/details/georgeblood

https://archive.org/details/78rpm_bowling_green

F*ck the RIAA and absurdly long copyright.


EDIT: There is more than one collection of 78s on IA, so I updated the title.


The issue with these collections are that they're absolutely HUGE. And yes, IA offers torrents for them, but as a separate torrent for every. single. album. And the torrents have all data in them -- FLAC, fixed-rate MP3, VBR MP3, PDF liner notes, etc. etc... there may be some extremely hardcore data-hoarders out there who want everything, but IMHO as these are scratchy old 78 records, FLAC is overkill to just save the audio in a listenable format. The George Blood collection, just the VBR MP3s, is looking to be about 6TB. With ALL data it might be over 40TB! I can't afford that many hard drives :)


So, my approach at the moment is to save just the VBR MP3s (they seem to be done at up to 320kbps VBR) and the JPEG album cover. If I have a chance and any storage left afterwards, I can make a separate pass to get the album liner PDFs...


Tool used: https://github.com/jjjake/internetarchive


Patch to allow setting start and end item indices for downloads: https://github.com/jjjake/internetarchive/pull/605


Example usage to grab just the VBR MP3 and record label JPG for each (note the --start-idx and --end-idx arguments):

#ia download --start-idx=4001 --end-idx=8000 -a -i --format="VBR MP3" --format="JPEG" --search collection:georgeblood

I'm going to concentrate on the George Blood collection for now.. I'm starting at item 1. It would be great if others started at index 50,000, 100,000, 150,000, ... and others started at the end and worked backwards in similarly-sized chunks, so that it's assured someone gets each of them.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Copyright has completely jumped the shark. There's absolutely no balance between the public benefit of the public domain.

30 years ought to be enough time for anyone to extract any reasonable value from an IP. If you haven't made your profit in 30 years, then let the public benefit from it.

Or at least let preservationists (data hoarders, let's be honest) keep our cultural history alive and accessible for future generations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool tool! Please consider leaving GitHub for any of the numerous FOSS options.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, it's not my project -- I already have moved my own projects off there, yeah.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's awesome! Really encouraging seeing projects and devs migrate away from closed-source and proprietary systems and features. 💪

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

sourcehut, self-hosted Gogs or Forgejo are some good candidates. Gitea is popular, but there's apparently been some drama about them going commercial without proper buy-in from their contributors. (The code lineage is AFAIK Gogs → Gitea → Forgejo).


All the above solutions make it super-easy to mirror a github project as well, just in case it goes away :) Doing so has saved my arse more than a few times when github takes a repo down for stupid reasons.


Mandatory plug for [email protected] :)


Gitlab seems too heavyweight to me. I use Gogs myself on my home server. No code review tools via PR ala github/gitlab, but I don't need those in my web frontend.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Probably stating the obvious but „are in no threat of being deleted“ is an absolute joke.

A company holding the IP can just make it unavailable tormorrow. A big chunk of us is here because reddit somehow is allowed to delete our posts because the law is idiotic. At least european people are allowed to get their data but the cooperative works of thousands of people is threatened due to those laws.

The concept of IP needs to be reformed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As concrete examples, try to get a copy of Disney's 1946 movie, "Song of the South." It's been removed from circulation because of its whitewashed presentation of "happy slaves." Similarly, 6 of Dr. Seuss' books, including "And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street" were withdrawn because of racial imagery (the mentioned book had a "Chinaman" drawn with a WWII stereotype style - rice hat, sloping eyes, buck teeth).

There's media you simply can't get anymore.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Our culture has been copyrighted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In this case, the media was withdrawn for (arguably) good reasons: the representations were deemed hurtful or harmful.

Good reasons or bad, they still stand as stark examples of how media can disappear at the whims of a single organization.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fun fact, there is a fan made blu-ray quality remaster of Song of the South available on IA.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Say what? Now I'm curious how they handled the slavery topic, and found actors for it.

Thanks for the heads-up!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Did you think your posts on Reddit were protected by copyright laws or something?

Are you seriously comparing posts on a forum to music rights?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What exactly are you trying to convey? That these „works“ made by ordinary people who have only a basic understanding of copyright law should be deleted if someone feels like it? That the law is more important than justice?

Also, do you really think you‘re cool by implying things phrased as a question? Won‘t you just talk like a normal person and state your opinion instead of fake-calling-out others?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Posts you make on a forum are not "works" that are copyrightable. Deleting a post is not an injustice.

Sentences phrased with a question mark means it's asking a question. When someone asks a question, the normal response is to then provide an answer to that question.

But you're just being an asshole. You know exactly what I'm saying, and you know you're saying ridiculous things so your only response is not answering either of the two questions and and then try to twist it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I‘m glad you saw your mistake. Have a good one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not going to answer anything, huh? Typical.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Posts you make on a forum are not "works" that are copyrightable.

That may depend on the platform -- slashdot (remember that site?) once upon a time had a footer on their pages stating "All posts belong to their authors". There were a few big debates about that being legally enforceable. Hmm. I wonder if there ever was a legal ruling on that.

I notice today their site does not have such a disclaimer. Probably disappeared long ago, due to one of their many corporate buyouts.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah. And whenever anyone says "Oh the music companies would never let these old recordings die, it's their bread and butter!" I give them this story.

We cannot trust our cultural heritage to any one entity.