Selfhosted

39964 readers

226 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

RPi Alternatives for Self-hosting (lemmy.mohammadodeh.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

74 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here is the thing, I have 4 RPi’s of different generations (all the way from Zero W to 4B 4GB) that I use to host services at home for personal use.

Lately, I have realized I am running out of RAM to host more services, not to mention not enough switch ports to connect to.

Now I know the obvious solution is to get a more powerful setup (maybe a thin client) but electricity isn’t cheap and I am not particularly in the best shape financially speaking to shell out $300+ on a decent client to host my services.

Any suggestions?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

why is an x86 architecture a sought after feature

Software compatibility.

My understanding is that ARM is more “bang for your buck” in terms of computation effort to power draw.

Yes but it's also usually a small "bang".

my M2 (ARM based) MacBook does all sorts of heavy lifting

The new Apple silicon is a quantum leap in technology in many ways. Apple managed to make something with desktop-level power and SBC-level efficiency. It's why they abandoned desktop computers altogether.

The industry is in the process of shifting in that direction but they're still way behind Apple.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Thank you for your insight, I see your point.

Why do you say they abandoned desktop computers though? Aren’t they still designing and selling iMacs? Aren’t those considered desktop computers?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Well they abandoned desktop processors. The inefficient ones with giant heatsinks.